Those
were the recent press headlines reporting on the court action brought
against the government by an organisation claiming to be a coalition
of Christian groups who approached the courts asking that it;
1.
Declare the regulations that allow for religious marks of halaal, kosher
etc that excludes Christianity as unconstitutional.
2. If these products carry
religious signs on its packaging then similar food products without
these signs must also be made available to the consumer.
3.
Asks the government to introduce measures ensuring that costs associated
with these signs are not directly or indirectly passed on to consumers
of other religious groups who are excluded on the labelling.
SANHA
regards this action as ill-conceived, flawed, ludicrous in its demands,
unpatriotic and malicious.
The
credibility of this group, their representation and standing in the
Christian community needs to be established. The recent outcry on the
hot cross buns turned out to be the work of a small fringe group as
opposed to mainstream Christianity where the likes of the Southern African
Catholic Bishops Conference distanced themselves from this kind of extremism.
All Christians should not be tarred with the same brush.
Dietary
laws apparently are not a fundamental article of the Christian faith.
For example in the Old Testament in Leviticus 11: 8 of the swine it
is said “of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their
carcass shall ye not touch;..”, yet today it is
consumed Christian. In the New Testament it is stated by the Apostle
Paul in Romans 14:16-18: "For the kingdom of God is
not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness, peace and
joy in the Holy Spirit."
Therefore
what we see here is religious apartheid, where this Christian group
would have no objection on missionary work preaching brotherhood of
man, love thy neighbour, and Jesus as the Saviour, while blatantly showing
intolerance and bigotry on religious labelling. We do not believe that
mainstream Christianity supports this.
Manufacturers rely on various
factors in ensuring their product has a competitive edge to increase
their market share. These include patented technologies, unique features,
better pricing, packaging and/or service and product enhancements that
add value. Amongst these tried and tested practices is endorsement by
organisations and services such as a medical body, an industry guild
or association, quality standards e.g. ISO, Bureau of Standards, Good
Food Society, Proudly South African, Heart Foundation, Vegetarian society,
Shuddah Hindu, Kosher and of course, the Halaal certification marks.
A Halaal mark signifies that the product was produced in a Halaal compliant
facility which is free from Pork, alcohol and non-Halaal materials using
only permitted ingredients and is an assurance to consumers that follow
a Halaal lifestyle.
In our free market society
and it stands to reason that these enhancements are for that competitive
edge. No businessman will intentionally pay a price to have such an
enhancement if there was no demand or to deliberately aggravate his
customers. Therefore the process is a self regulating one in that customers
vote with their feet and will take their business elsewhere if it does
not satisfy their own criteria of price, presentation, performance,
religious assurance etc.
The challenge on constitutional
grounds will be a double edged sword as it is also the constitutional
right of religious and other interest groups to have their rights of
religion and association upheld. And what about the rights of the trader
to be able to freely market his products on a willing seller, willing
buyer basis without being impeded by a fringe group wanting to forcibly
impose its views unjustly on others?
Even the call by this misguided
group for government intervention on duplicating products and having
measures in place to control costs is naive, ludicrous to the extreme
and impractical to implement. We regard any action that oxygenate the
embers of the flame of hatred between South Africans of all races, colours,
religious persuasions as unpatriotic and a betrayal of the struggle
which included immense contributions by religious leaders to establish
a just and democratic society.
SANHA
extends an invitation in an Islamic spirit of tolerance and brotherhood
to this unknown coalition group to meet with us so that we may enlighten
them on the beauty of a Halaal lifestyle, and demonstrate the folly
of their action which leads to bigotry and intolerance.